Amazon

A few recommended books, movies, games, and albums. If you want to look for more recommendations, feel free to look at the larger selection over at Amazon or my Amazon Store with more recommendations.

  • Man School: lessons on love, power, honor and purpose
    Man School: lessons on love, power, honor and purpose
    by Michael Bronco
  • Cryptonomicon
    Cryptonomicon
    by Neal Stephenson
  • Programming in Objective-C 2.0 (2nd Edition)
    Programming in Objective-C 2.0 (2nd Edition)
    by Stephen G. Kochan

    An outstanding introduction to the core of the Objective-C language.

  • DreamCypher
    DreamCypher
    Dancing Ferret
  • Tron: Legacy (Amazon MP3 Exclusive Version) [+Digital Booklet]
    Tron: Legacy (Amazon MP3 Exclusive Version) [+Digital Booklet]
    Walt Disney Records
  • Cocoa(R) Programming for Mac(R) OS X (3rd Edition)
    Cocoa(R) Programming for Mac(R) OS X (3rd Edition)
    by Aaron Pablo Hillegass
  • The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress
    The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress
    by Robert A. Heinlein
  • Hot Fuzz (Widescreen Edition)
    Hot Fuzz (Widescreen Edition)
    starring Jim Broadbent, Kenneth Cranham, Timothy Dalton, Julia Deakin, Patricia Franklin

Entries in cloud (3)

Tuesday
Feb102009

.Mac, most hardly knew thee.

With a recent announcement by Google, you can almost hear the air getting sucked out of .mac's sails.

Say what?

OK. .mac is Apple's much touted, and honestly, underdeveloped mail hosting service/sync service/online disk space/remote access service that was recently rebranded as mobileme/.me. Frankly, it's a bastard stepchild. While I've had legitimate uses for it and it's premium pricing (just wait, I'll explain), most users have never needed most of what it offers, or could easily get it for free. The biggest thing going for it lately was .mac-based syncing for the iPhone, that offered a compelling reason to shell out the bucks.

Well, Google is now offering exchange-server based syncing called Mobile Sync that works with a number of smart phones - including the iPhone. With it, you can keep your gmail-based contacts and Google calendars wirelessly synchronized with your iPhone. And it's free.

OK. It's hardly the end of the world. There are still a number of advantages that .mac has, but Google sync just made it a lot less compelling.

Pro's for Google Mobile Sync:


  • Easy to share calendars with other people and fairly easy to see other people's shared calendars as long as they're on Google. Google calendars has it all over iCal here.

  • Reliable. You don't have to deal with the vagaries of Apple's built-in syncing services. Google has the server, Google keeps the calendar. Any changes you make to it after using the calDav tools like Calaboration to give you direct access to your Google calendar in iCal will be reflected within minutes no matter where else you look at your calendar. The calendar and contacts are synchronized over the relatively tried and tested (yes, I'm grinding my teeth saying it, but credit where due) Exchange activesync services. Since the current Apple Address Book app in Leopard natively syncs to any specified Google Mail account, this gives you a completely different channel to keep your mail and contacts and calendars synchronized on your phone and desktop. It also makes them available via the web, while letting you use the interface (web or local) that best suits your way of working.

Cons:


  • Privacy. Well - there are some who worry about Google and privacy. I understand these concerns, but don't worry enough to not use them where they're the best tool for the job.

  • Five Calendars synchronized. You can have more than five calendars, but only five of them can be synchronized to your smartphone. I solved this by grouping what used to be separate calendars together.

  • Ease of setup. If you have a new computer and iPhone - great. No problem. However, if, like me, you have a bunch of contact and calendar information already, then .mac is still the clear winner here. Between consolidating calendars, backing up data on the phone and the computers, exporting out individual calendars to import into Google cal, importing them, etc... it's hardly a painless synchronization or one-click export. If, on the other hand, you already use Google and never used iCal anyway, then you still have the option of viewing the calendars in iCal. This is useful because a lot of programs in OSX are aware of the address book and the iCal calendars.

  • .mac plays better with mail programs than GMAIL. Especially the built in Apple Mail.app. Go figure. That said, this is true because Google does a few non-standard things to make tags work within the folder paradigm that most mail programs use.

  • Doesn't replace the "Back to My Mac" functionality. - though as I recall LogMeIn now has a free mac program that allows you to get some of that (remotely controlling your computer) for free.


So... getting all this to work can be a little harder than .mac, and you still don't get to synch bookmarks, but it's free, and it works. For people like me who've had a .mac address for years, well, we're not giving it up. At this point though, I can't really point to mobileme sync as a compelling reason to push .mac/.me/mobileme.

Monday
Aug042008

Jobs on MobileMe issues on iPhone 3G Launch Day..

One word: Amen

Tuesday
Aug282007

A Look Further Afield..

I normally don't pay much attention to what John Dvorak has to say, but in this case I think he's got a point. He's taken a look at the further implications of the Windows Activation outage and applied it to all web services by asking the question - is it any safer to depend on online access to your data?

Me, I take it with a grain of salt. I use online backups as a slower, redundant system in case a fire or something takes out the much faster backup system at the office. I use Flickr, and this blog as a way to communicate with other people. Both of these are things that I cannot do without the web.  There's a bit of a gray line when it comes to services like Google Calendar - which I  sync or subscribe to via iCal so if I don't have online access I still have a copy of my data from the last time I got online, and a backup if they ever cancel that service. I go to the trouble because it allows my wife and I to keep a common calendar where I can refer to it when I'm off at work.

The only place I use an online document system is Googles notebook - and that is also used strictly for communicating with the people I work with.

Anything else I do - image manipulation, document creation, general writing, I have my own tools on my own computers that will work whether or not the internet is available, and can always be attached as files and sent to people. Not wanting to depend on the availability of servers is one reason why I work this way. It just hadn't occured to me to think in terms of "What if you have internet access but the service gets shut down." After all, who'd have thought Google would shut a service down, especially after people paid for it?